Blogs

Benchmarking Board Sustainability Oversight

By Randi Morrison posted 06-14-2018 05:27 PM

  
According to this new report: "SYSTEMS RULE: How Board Governance Can Drive Sustainability Performance" from Ceres/KKS Advisors, which analyzes how Forbes 500 boards oversee sustainability, 39% of companies have a formal mandate for sustainability at the board level - either through a dedicated sustainability committee or inclusion of sustainability oversight responsibilities in another board committee's charter, with a dedicated CSR Committee being the most common approach:

Which board committee has responsibility for sustainability?

  • Corporate Social Responsibility: 25%
  • Nom/Gov: 18%
  • Environmental, Health and Safety: 14%
  • Public Policy:  13%
  • Sustainability or Sustainable Development: 13%
  • Risk, Regulatory or Compliance: 6%
  • Social & Ethics: 5%
  • Audit; Quality & Technology - each 2%:
  • Executive; Strategy; Compensation - each 1%

An additional 23% of Forbes 500 boards don't evidence formal sustainability oversight (e.g., there is no committee with formal responsibility), but the board receives regular sustainability updates.

The report's coverage - which is based on the public disclosures of 475 of the Forbes 500 - includes benchmarking data on board composition and executive compensation incentive practices, and specific recommendations for enhanced board oversight.

          See also this Ceres post.  We first covered this report - together with a report on newly-released, institutional investor-facilitated Board E&S Oversight & Disclosure Guidance - in this week's Society Alert.

0 comments
198 views

Permalink